United States of America, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, 600 E Street NW., Suite 9500, Washington, DC 20530, Plaintiff, v. End Signature United States District Court for the District of Columbia Start Signatureĭeputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. Comments should be directed to James Tierney, Chief, Networks and Technology Section, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, 600 E. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. Public comment is invited within 60 days of the date of this notice. Copies of these materials may be obtained from the Antitrust Division upon request and payment of the copying fee set by Department of Justice regulations. The proposed Final Judgment, filed the same time as the Complaint, requires The Thomson Corporation to divest a copy of its WorldScope fundamentals product, along with certain other assets, and requires Reuters Group PLC to divest copies of its Estimates and Aftermarket (Embargoed) Research Database product, along with certain other assets.Ĭopies of the Complaint, proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement are available for inspection at the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Antitrust Documents Group, 325 7th Street, NW., Room 215, Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 20), on the Department of Justice's Web site at: atr, and at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. On February 19, 2008, the United States filed a Complaint alleging that the proposed acquisition by The Thomson Corporation of Reuters Group PLC would violate section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Stipulation and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States of America v. Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. Standard of Review Under The APPA for the Proposed Final Judgment Alternatives to the Proposed Final Judgment Procedures Available for Modification of the Proposed Final Judgment Remedies Available to Potential Private Litigants Asset Presentation: Stipulations and Order Selected Provisions of the Proposed Final Judgment Explanation of the Proposed Final Judgment The Competitive Effects of the Transaction on the Relevant Markets for Fundamentals Data, Earnings Estimates Data, and Aftermarket Research Reports The Defendants and the Proposed Transaction
Description of the Events Giving Rise to the Alleged Violation Schedule 1-Description of Divestiture Assets.The Thomson Corporation and Reuters Group PLC, Defendants. United States District Court for the District of Columbia United States of America, Plaintiff, v.The Proposed Transaction Will Harm Competition in the Relevant Markets United States District Court for the District of Columbia.This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links Headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the Provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts. Rendition of the daily Federal Register on does not Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML Legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
The official SGML-based PDF version on, those relying on it for The material on is accurately displayed, consistent with While every effort has been made to ensure that Regulatory information on with the objective ofĮstablishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.įor complete information about, and access to, our official publications Informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal This prototype edition of theĭaily Federal Register on will remain an unofficial Each document posted on the site includes a link to theĬorresponding official PDF file on. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official It is not an official legal edition of the Federal This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the dailyįederal Register.